Review Nepal News

Unifier Prithvi Narayan Shah and Risky Present Nepal

Dirgha Raj Prasai
  Kathmandu, Nepal      January 05 2016
Dirgha Raj Prasai

Dirgha Raj Prasai

 

                                                                            
Prithvi Narayan Shah, the unifier is the pride of Nepal. It was almost 100 years before Germany and Italy was unified and the restoration of the Meiji dynasty was restored that Prithvi Narayan Shah had unified 54 small fiefdoms to build a large, expanded and strong Nepal. But in the name of people war the Maoist smashed the statue of the Great King Prithvi Narayan Shah under the leadership of the Catholic Maoist Baburam Bhattarai. Since 2006, the Congress, UML, Maoist came to power they called off the birth anniversary 27th Poush of the unifier and canceled the national unity day. It was a matter of grief that the evil elements in the name of Maoism had vandalized the glorious statue of Prithbinarayan Shah in Pokhara and replaced the statue of Lakhan Thapa.  Is there not any place in Nepal for Lakhana Thapa?  
 
These culprits destroyed the statues of the national builders by the hint of Sonia Catholic Congress (I) and RAW who wanted to Christianize in this pious land-Hindu and Buddha. The agitators were used by CIA's tactic who had vandalized the statue of Lenin in Soviet Union. In that same pretext the statue of Saddam Hussein also toppled in Iraq. So, the native terrorists were mobilized to vandalize the statues of the great warrior Prithvi Narayan Shah, who had fought against imperialist forces and started to vandalize the statues of the great nationalist King Mahendra, great poet Bhanubhakta, Sidhicharan Shrestha and such nationalist heroes. 
 
In that context, a Nepali scholar Sushil Sharma said-'If Prithbinarayan Shah had not does the unification so, Gurung, Rais, Limbus and other Janajatis (indigenous people), Dalits could have been either swallowed up by the Chinese conquests in Tibet or engulfed by the Indians. If Prithbinarayan was a tyrant, why did he make Kathmandu of the country and not Gorkha? He could have been violent but we are today known as Nepalese under the common roof of Nepal because of His unification drive.' The creator of this nation, Prithbinarayan Shah had pointed out in His golden Message-'This is not the nation gained by my trifle efforts, this is the garden of all class of flowers, may all be aware of this.' It is our duty that each and every citizen of Nepal is the equal owner of this country.
 
The parliamentary parties- Congress and UML also joined their hands with Maoist and then they started to impose the secularism, republic and the concept of federal-ethnic autonomy to disintegrate this country. 
 
It has now become all clear that RAW (Research and Analysis Wing, the Indian intelligence Agency) had mobilized the Maoists, Congress, UML parties to sign in the 12-point agreement and launched them into agitation by provided them with instruction and money to destroy Nepal. Dristi, a Left vernacular weekly, has explicitly written on its 25 Dec 2007 issue that chief of RAW Ashok Chaturvedi brought the Maoists and the Nepali Congress together by forcing them to write in the interim constitution that Nepal will become a republican country. Chaturvedi had kept UML General Secretary Madhav Kumar Nepal-now PM as a witness in the settlement of dispute between Prime Minister late Girija Prasad Koirala and Maoist Chairman Prachanda. This clearly proves that the leaders of so-called the big three parties have become servile to foreigners and have been assisting the foreigners to meddle in Nepal's sovereignty. The Indian still maintains its wish to keep Nepal under its security umbrella. It has been proved that India by using Prachanda and Baburam Bhattarai to Bhutanisation, Sikkimisation and Fijisation of Nepal in the name of abolition of monarchy.
 
In the context of the movement of 1990, former Prime Minister Marich Man Singh says that time also RAW brought together one dozen left parties that never used to see on each other's eyes like the seven parties now and also forged a working alliance with the Nepali Congress. Thinking Nepalese people would not hit the streets, India even brought 6,000 Bhutanese of Nepalese origin to Kathmandu to show Nepali faces in the movement (27 Dec 2007). 
 
A scholar Dr. Ramesh Dhungel writes-The thousands of years of old monarchy has been eliminated, another difficult task of turning the nation into a federal structure is in motion. It seems clear that Nepali politicians and social activists are distorting the realities of the nation's history by highly romanticizing the discourses within the framework of social and political change. It is notable that the very exercise of Nepal as an independent country was made possible only because of geographical situation of the region by Prithbinarayan Shaha alongside the committed, dedicated and trusted ministers and generals belonging to the various origins. Very surprisingly, Nepal was able to stand its ground as an independent, unique and powerful multi-ethnics state situated in the lap of the Himalayas, even in such a vulnerable situation where such extreme colonial encroachment in South Asia was rife. People of different ethnic backgrounds seemed to have united under the umbrella of the newly emergent Nepal. In many cases, a practical policy, offering dependent states to smaller friendly principalities was adopted by the king of Nepal.'  
 
It is already public that after the movement of 1990 gained momentum, the then Indian Foreign Secretary, showing the scare of the people's movement, came to Kathmandu on April 1990 with a draft agreement under which Nepal's defense and foreign policy would be under Indian domain and late King Birendra had rejected the agreement outright. Therefore, in the absence of a leader who can take stance, India conspires to make Nepal a failed state. In this situation, Prachanda and his Maoist party should be clear whether it wants to walk on the path of their Chinese namesake Mao's perception towards Nepal or it want to continue walking on the direction and instruction of the Indian intelligence agency. 
 
 
It must be remembered that the credibility of the party leaders has lost before the people. Can the country and the people be safe from murderers and the traitors? The dead fish can't swim in the river.
 
 
Even while walking on the path directed by RAW, Narayan Man Bijukchhe of Nepal Workers and Peasants Party, one among the seven parties, says Indian is exerting its influence on Nepal's political, diplomatic, economic and social sectors and RAW is the main liaison of this. Saroj Raj Adhikary has written in 9th Dec issue of Nepal Saptahik, a weekly magazine, that 'India, through RAW, is taking the disgruntled groups of the Terai as a medium to serve its political and economic interest in Nepal. RAW is active in Nepal for the last 40 years'. Jan Aastha, another Left weekly, writes: 'Home Minister Krishna Prasad Sitaula himself is a man who is very close and has close contacts with the Indian intelligence network'. (26 Dec 2007).  
 
When the country is seized by these traitors how can there be peace? Because they are traitors and anti-nationals they smash the statues of late King Prithvi Narayan Shah and King Mahendra. These treacherous leaders of Congress, UML & Maoist parties have become the stooge of the foreigners as they are finishing off the prestige of the country by disregarding the worth of the Supreme Court and defaming the national army. These leaders of the so called big parties do not believe in the rule of law, they are not democratic and they do not believe the constitutional way. It must be remembered that the credibility of the party leaders has lost before the people. Can the country and the people be safe from murderers and the traitors? The dead fish can't swim in the river.
 
A prolific writer Yubaraj Ghimire writes- 'Prithvi Narayan Shah not only brought caste- and ethnicity-based states under the umbrella of Nepal, but also laid a solid foundation for the modern state. Nepal was a “yam between two boulders” suggesting the need for a delicate balance of relationship between its two big neighbors, a fundamental rule of Nepal’s foreign policy even now. On the domestic front, foreign traders should not be allowed; that all mines and minerals should be kept under our own control as outsiders would make the country bankrupt; that foreign goods, including clothes, must be discarded and home-spinning promoted; that prosperous people alone would make monarchy stronger; that there should be probity in public life; that both “bribe givers and takers are criminals”. '
Interestingly, when Nepal ushered in an age of radicalism-since 2006, the Maoists and some human rights champions advocated going back to the pre- Prithvi Narayan Shah era, saying a federal Nepal should have ethnicity-based provinces, all with the right to self-determination. With Nepal’s dwindling image in the international comity, the prediction that it is going to be a failed state, and with no hope entrusted on the current political players, Prithvi Narayan Shah — after a gap of four years — is being looked on as the savior of Nepal’s dignity, independence and growth. Politicians, including the Maoists, are at a receiving end. Shah’s warning that “bribe givers and takers are both enemies of the nation” is a quote that many Nepalese repeat today, pointing fingers at their new leaders. Recognized indices put Nepal as one of the most corrupt countries in the world.' -Indian Express, 16th Jan.2011.
 
In the context of Nepal, monarchy is taken as the symbol of protector of the country and a symbol of the country. In terms of security, Nepal is a Hindu Kingdom and as a common language among different ethnicities it is the Nepali language. By destroying these three entities of free and sovereign Nepal, the Indian intelligence agency is using the leaders of Maoist, Congress, UML and Madhesi as Lendup Dorje of Sikkim. They do not do what they speak and do not speak what they do. Because of their hooliganism, unconstitutional path and corruption and mismanagement, they have insulted the country before the international community in all sectors. 
 
It is surprising why do the foreigners still believe them? But the Nepalese people no longer want such dubious unconstitutional confused rule of the party leaders. The Nepalese only believe in parliamentary democracy and always follow the constitutional monarch's path with identified symbol of united Nepal-'Hindu kingdom.' This country cannot survive with these traitors' Maoists, UML, Congress leaders.  It is now time for the nationalists of all the political parties and outside and the national army and relieves the country from the destructive agendas-the secularism, republic and federalism of EU, CIA and RAW. 
 
The British Empire, spreading in Asia, after getting hold in India had eyed on mountainous region i.e. Nepal. It was not an easy task to fight against the British imperialistic force in the mid 18th century. As, the culture, the religion and the nationality was in a danger, which compelled Prithvi Narayan Shah to unify the Greater Nepal, including the many small Hindu states and protected Buddhism and other religions too. Prithvi Narayan Shah had kept the originality of mountainous Nepal by holding the Moon-Sun depicting flag to wave, which obliged all the Nepalese in the world. So, to keep intact Nepal's sovereignty, unity and stability we all nationalists within the all parties, Nepal army, security forces and others including the King should take a step forward.  
              
Email: dirgharajprasai@gmail.com